Computational and Neural Studies of Eye Movement


Basic approach and rationale

Eye movements provide many advantages for investigating neural mechanisms of both reflexive and voluntary behavior. Eye movements exhibit properties such as visual-motor coordination, learning, and memory that can be generalized to other systems. Yet, the neural machinery of eye movement is accessible for quantitative study and modeling. Our experiments are conducted in awake, behaviorally trained rhesus monkeys and entail quantitative assessment of motor performance, extracellular recording from single brain cells during eye movement, and computational analyses of models that are based on biological observations.

Learning and memory in the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR)

The VOR responds to head turns with compensatory eye movements that keep the eyes stable in space. Even in total darkness, the performance of the VOR is superb -- a head turn in one direction produces an equal amplitude smooth eye rotation in the opposite direction. If a monkey views the stationary environment through telescope spectacles, there are gradual "learned" changes in the eye movements evoked by head turns in darkness. After several days, the eye movements of the VOR in the dark are nearly appropriate for the visual conditions seen through the spectacles, demonstrating "memory" of the learned changes. In 1994, we published the results of a long series of experiments leading to the hypothesis that there are two sites of memory: one in the cerebellar cortex and one in the brainstem (Lisberger et al 1994a,b,c; Lisberger 1994). In collaboration with Mike Mauk, we then argued that the circuits for motor learning in the VOR have much in common with those for classical conditioning of the eyelid response (Raymond et al 1996). In 1998, we published the analysis of possible error signals to control modifications at both sites (Raymond & Lisberger 1998). This analysis revealed that different signals might be important for vestibular stimuli over different frequency ranges, and showed that a comparison of vestibular inputs and climbing fiber responses would be an effective error signal only if each climbing fiber response was compared with the vestibular inputs from 100 ms earlier. Ongoing projects include:

Visual-motor transformations for smooth pursuit eye movements

When a small, smoothly moving object appears, primates are able to generate a smooth eye movement having a velocity nearly equal to the velocity of the target. The basic anatomical circuit for pursuit is known -- from retina to motoneuron. We are trying to understand signal processing in pursuit. In 1994, we published a model of smooth pursuit eye movements in which the dynamics of pursuit arose from the dynamics of visual processing, specifically from the use of input signals related to image acceleration across the retina (Krauzlis & Lisberger 1994). In 1999, we demonstrated responses that provide information about both image velocity and image acceleration in extrastriate visual area MT of anesthetized monkeys (Lisberger & Movshon 1999). This paper also showed that it was possible to reconstruct both image velocity and image acceleration from the population response in MT, by using a simple vector-averaging computation. In parallel investigations, we have demonstrated a number of basic features of pursuit eye movements including: motor learning (Kahlon & Lisberger 1996), vector averaging for 2-target stimuli (Lisberger & Ferrera 1997), immediate modulation of pursuit gain (Schwartz & Lisberger 1994), and post-saccadic enhancement (Lisberger 1998). Ongoing projects include: